4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Producing carbohydrate-rich microalgal biomass grown under mixotrophic conditions as feedstock for biohydrogen production

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 41, Issue 7, Pages 4413-4420

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.163

Keywords

Carbohydrate; Biohydrogen; Microalgae; Chlorella; Clostridium butyricum; Dark fermentation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three indigenous microalgae strains (Scenedesmus subspicatus GY-16, Chlorella vulgaris FSP-E, and Anistrodesmus gracilis GY-09) were evaluated for their ability to accumulate carbohydrates to subsequently serve as feedstock for biohydrogen production. The results of photoautotrophic growth show that among the three strains examined, C. vulgaris FSP-E displayed the highest biomass productivity (825.6 mg/L/d) and carbohydrate productivity (365.8 mg/L/d). Mixotrophic growth of C. vulgaris FSP-E with the addition of 2.0 g/l of sodium acetate further increased the biomass and carbohydrate productivity to 1022.3 mg/L/d and 498.5 mg/L/d, respectively. Moreover, operating photobioreactor on semi-batch mode enhanced the stability for prolonged incubation of the carbohydrate-rich C. vulgaris FSP-E and the biomass and carbohydrate productivity obtained were 1063.3 and 384.8 mg/L/d, respectively. The biomass of C. vulgaris FSP-E was then used as feedstock for biohydrogen production via separate hydrolysis and fermentation processes. The acidic hydrolysate (hydrolyzed with 1% H2SO4) was fermented with Clostridium butyricum CGS5, giving a maximum H-2 yield of 2.87 mmol H-2/g biomass and a H-2 production rate of 176.9 ml/h'l, which are higher than most reported values. The results obtained in this work indicate that carbohydrate-based microalgae feedstock shows good potential for biohydrogen production. Copyright (C) 2015, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available