4.8 Article

Decoupling mass transport and electron transfer by a double-cathode structure of a Li-O2 battery with high cyclic stability

Journal

JOULE
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 381-398

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.01.003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21773055, 21805070]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) , Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office under Clean Vehicles
  3. US-China Clean Energy Research Centre (CERC-CVC2)
  4. DOE Office of Science [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of a double-cathode structure in lithium-oxygen batteries can decouple oxygen mass transport and electron transfer, leading to improved cyclic stability and increased cycle life. This concept can also be applied to other metal-rechargeable batteries with conversion-type chemistry.
Aprotic lithium-oxygen (Li-O-2) batteries have attracted extensive attention due to their ultrahigh theoretical energy density. However, slow and undesired electron transfer during cathodic reactions causes low cyclic stability in these batteries. Here, we demonstrate that O-2 mass transport and electron transfer for cathodic reactions in Li-O-2 batteries could be decoupled by a double-cathode structure that efficiently enables stable electron transfer between the cathode and Li2O2/O-2. This resolves various side reactions and slow Li2O2 reaction kinetics issues in conventional Li-O-2 batteries, leading to stable operation of the cell for nearly 2 months at a capacity of 0.2 and 5 mAh cm -2, with more than 4-and 10-fold increases in cycle life when compared with single-cathode batteries. These remarkable improvements in the cyclic stability of Li-O-2 batteries with double cathodes provide an interesting concept for improving the operational stability of other metal-rechargeable batteries with conversion-type chemistry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available