4.6 Article

An Efficient Multi-Level Convolutional Neural Network Approach for White Blood Cells Classification

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020248

Keywords

white blood cells classification; deep learning; multi-level classification; multi-source datasets

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evaluation of white blood cells is crucial for assessing the quality of the human immune system. This research proposes a two-stage hybrid multi-level scheme for efficiently classifying four cell groups, which could serve as a computer-aided diagnosis tool to support pathologists in assessing white blood cells from blood smear images.
The evaluation of white blood cells is essential to assess the quality of the human immune system; however, the assessment of the blood smear depends on the pathologist's expertise. Most machine learning tools make a one-level classification for white blood cell classification. This work presents a two-stage hybrid multi-level scheme that efficiently classifies four cell groups: lymphocytes and monocytes (mononuclear) and segmented neutrophils and eosinophils (polymorphonuclear). At the first level, a Faster R-CNN network is applied for the identification of the region of interest of white blood cells, together with the separation of mononuclear cells from polymorphonuclear cells. Once separated, two parallel convolutional neural networks with the MobileNet structure are used to recognize the subclasses in the second level. The results obtained using Monte Carlo cross-validation show that the proposed model has a performance metric of around 98.4% (accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score). The proposed model represents a good alternative for computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tools for supporting the pathologist in the clinical laboratory in assessing white blood cells from blood smear images.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available