4.7 Review

A Review of the Opportunities and Challenges for Using Remote Sensing for Management of Surface-Canopy Forming Kelps

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.753531

Keywords

kelp forest; remote sensing; North America; coastal management; kelp management; bull kelp; giant kelp

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface-canopy forming kelps are crucial for ecosystems, but are under threat from global and local pressures. Remote sensing data is a valuable tool for monitoring kelp forests, but must be carefully selected and tailored to management objectives and regional characteristics. Integration of different datasets and approaches is important for promoting coordination of management strategies.
Surface-canopy forming kelps provide the foundation for ecosystems that are ecologically, culturally, and economically important. However, these kelp forests are naturally dynamic systems that are also threatened by a range of global and local pressures. As a result, there is a need for tools that enable managers to reliably track changes in their distribution, abundance, and health in a timely manner. Remote sensing data availability has increased dramatically in recent years and this data represents a valuable tool for monitoring surface-canopy forming kelps. However, the choice of remote sensing data and analytic approach must be properly matched to management objectives and tailored to the physical and biological characteristics of the region of interest. This review identifies remote sensing datasets and analyses best suited to address different management needs and environmental settings using case studies from the west coast of North America. We highlight the importance of integrating different datasets and approaches to facilitate comparisons across regions and promote coordination of management strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available