4.7 Article

Deep learning in mammography images segmentation and classification: Automated CNN approach

Journal

ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 4701-4709

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.048

Keywords

Mammography; Breast cancer; Segmentation; Deep learning; U-Net; Transfer learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new framework for breast cancer image segmentation and classification is proposed in this work, utilizing various models to classify mammographic images and segment breast areas. The method aims to assist radiologists in early detection and improve system efficiency.
In this work, a new framework for breast cancer image segmentation and classification is proposed. Different models including InceptionV3, DenseNet121, ResNet50, VGG16 and Mobile-NetV2 models, are applied to classify Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS), Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) and the Curated Breast Imaging Subset of DDSM (CBIS-DDSM) into benign and malignant. Moreover, the trained modified U-Net model is utilized to segment breast area from the mammogram images. This method will aid as a radiologist's assistant in early detection and improve the efficiency of our system. The Cranio Caudal (CC) vision and Mediolateral Oblique (MLO) view are widely used for the identification and diagnosis of breast cancer. The accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis will be improved as the number of views is increased. Our proposed frame work is based on MLO view and CC view to enhance the system performance. In addition, the lack of tagged data is a big challenge. Transfer learning and data augmentation are applied to overcome this problem. Three mammographic datasets; MIAS, DDSM and CBIS-DDSM, are utilized in our evaluation. End-to-end fully convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are introduced in this paper. The proposed technique of applying data augmentation with modified U-Net model and InceptionV3 achieves the best result, specifically with the DDSM dataset. This achieves 98.87% accuracy, 98.88% area under the curve (AUC), 98.98% sensitivity, 98.79% precision, 97.99% Fl score, and a computational time of 1.2134 s on DDSM datasets. (C) 2021 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available