4.8 Article

Geometric feature reproducibility for laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing with Inconel 718

Journal

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
Volume 47, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102305

Keywords

Laser powder bed fusion; L-PBF; Inconel 718; Additive manufacturing reproducibility; Machine configuration; Feature build plate; Test artifact; ASTM; ISO

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates a series of additively manufactured geometric feature build plates to compare baseline variations and process capabilities between different Laser Powder Bed Fusion machine configurations. The systematic error for build accuracy across all features was 23.8 +/- 5.5 mu m with a 99.9% confidence interval.
This study evaluates a series of additively manufactured geometric feature build plates to baseline variations and process capability between multiple Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) machine configurations. The geometric feature build plate has dimensions of 140 mm in X-orientation, 140 mm in Y-orientation, and 31.8 mm in Zheight. Geometric features incorporated include but are not limited to X- and Y-distances; varying angle walls; horizontal holes; and vertical features including round holes, concentric hollow cylinders, protruding cylinders, square channels, thin wall thicknesses, freeform surface, and slots. Select features are based on standardized ISO/ ASTM test artifact geometry. Additional features were included that are of interest for various aerospace or industrial applications and to understand practical limitations of various machine configurations. All the features are designed and located to be visually and geometrically accessible for inspection without removal from the base plate and to have high probability for successful printing among L-PBF platforms. Features from each of the 16 build plates were measured using optical and mechanical measurement methods and data compiled for a detailed evaluation of each feature. The systematic error for build accuracy across all features was 23.8 +/- 5.5 mu m with a 99.9% confidence interval.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available