4.3 Article

Should Hungary Pay More for a QALY Gain than Higher-Income Western European Countries?

Journal

APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 291-303

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00710-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Pecs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cost-effectiveness thresholds (CETs) play a crucial role in reimbursement decisions for health technologies in countries with limited healthcare resources. This study aims to propose a revised CET for the Hungarian health economic guidance. The research found that the current Hungarian CET is among the highest in European countries, and recommends implementing multiple CETs based on the relative quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain of new technologies. Additionally, it suggests using multiple CETs for rare diseases within a range of 3-10 times GDP per capita.
Objectives Cost-effectiveness thresholds (CETs) play a particularly important role in the reimbursement decisions of health technologies in countries with limited healthcare resources. Our goal is to develop a scientifically solid proposal for a revised cost-effectiveness threshold, as part of the planned review of the Hungarian health economic guidance. Methods The Threshold Working Group of the Hungarian Health Economics Association performed a targeted review on CETs in European countries. International trends on CETs served as a basis for our recommendation, which was discussed at the Association's workshop and deliberated at an expert committee meeting with representatives from the national health technology assessment (HTA) and healthcare payer bodies, and academic HTA centres. Results The current Hungarian CET is one of the highest among European countries relative to GDP per capita, and even higher in nominal value than the CET applied by NICE. As opposed to the current, single Hungarian threshold, other European countries apply multiple thresholds. The Working Group recommends that Hungary should also apply multiple CETs in the range of 1.5-3 times GDP per capita with stratification according to the relative quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain of the new technology. In addition, multiple CETs in the range of 3-10 times GDP per capita is recommended for technologies in rare diseases. Conclusions CETs should be aligned with the country's economic performance and should reflect societal preferences. Our recommendation may increase the efficiency of healthcare resource allocation in Hungary by strengthening the role of HTA in the reimbursement decisions and favouring new technologies with higher QALY gain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available