4.5 Article

Flood diversions and bypasses: Benefits and challenges

Journal

WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1562

Keywords

flood bypass; flood diversion; flood risk management; floodplain management

Funding

  1. Collegium de Lyon - Institut d'Etudes Avancees, Universite de Lyon, France
  2. EURIAS Fellowship Programme
  3. European Commission (Marie-Sklodowska-Curie Actions-COFUND Programme-FP7)
  4. IMeRA - Institut d'Etudes Avancees, Aix-Marseille Universite (AMU), France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flood diversions are essential complements to levees for flood management, redirecting excess water to reduce stage in the main river while providing important ecological functions. Different types of diversions vary in design and function, but managing flow split and preventing development that can affect diversion paths are significant challenges.
While levees are typically the focus of attention during floods, and higher levees are commonly demanded by the public for flood protection, levees alone cannot manage floods. Flood diversions take water from a flooding river to reduce stage in the main river, diverting excess flow to another location, often providing important ecological functions. Flood diversions are critically important complements to levees in managing floods on the Mississippi and Sacramento rivers, and elsewhere, with early examples going back 3000 years. Diversions range widely in design and function, so we propose a typology: flood bypasses, reconnected floodplains, compound channels, backwaters, distributaries, and inter-basin transfers. Flood bypasses route floodwaters around critical reaches, rejoining the river downstream; they can be tunnels and hard-engineered channels or wide areas of floodplain designated to convey flood flows, along a continuum of increasing residence time, greater potential for ecological benefit, but also greater land requirements. Managing the flow split (bifurcation) at the start of the flow diversion can be tricky. The flow split will depend on the angle and elevation difference between main channel and diversion, and can be affected by land subsidence, deposition of sediment, and accumulation of debris in either channel or control structures. One of the greatest challenges is keeping flow paths in the diversion free of development incompatible with inundation, but as these are often private lands and local governments are reluctant to withhold building permits, it has proved difficult to prevent such development, especially when the diversion is active only rarely. This article is categorized under: Engineering Water > Sustainable Engineering of Water Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness Science of Water > Water Extremes

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available