4.7 Article

Microhardness model based on geometrically necessary dislocations for heterogeneous material

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages 2792-2801

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.093

Keywords

Microhardness; Cast iron; Dislocations; Heterogeneous

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study extends the analysis of the indentation size effect (ISE) to lamellar cast irons, demonstrating that the tensile model and the concept of geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs) can be used to predict the ISE of the pearlitic matrix within these materials. The summation of stresses associated with GNDs and statistically stored dislocations (SSDs) is shown to be more adequate in the prediction of ISE compared to considering only one work-hardening stress.
Lamellar cast irons are known as heterogeneous materials. Their overall hardness is determined by the microhardness of their microstructure contents. This study pertains to extend the indentation size effect (ISE) analyses to these heterogeneous materials. Addi-tionally to macrohardness tests, Vickers microindentation tests were carried out on two cast irons with fully pearlitic matrix. Tensile models for pearlitic steel with both Tabor's law and Taylor's model were introduced in the ISE analyses. Microhardness expressions of the pearlitic phase within these irons were thus obtained. The obtained expressions indicate that the tensile model and the concept of geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs) can be used to predict the ISE of the pearlitic matrix. For this pearlitic phase, it is shown that the summation of the stresses, associated with the GNDs and SSDs, is more adequate than to consider only one work-hardening stress generated by the two types of dislocations density in the ISE study. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available