Journal
MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 209, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109978
Keywords
Microstructure; Void initiation; Grain size; Soft reduction; X-ray computed tomography
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [51874001, U1760108]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The formation of voids in medium carbon ferrite-pearlite steel was investigated in this study, with a focus on the initiation sites and governing factors such as prior austenite grain size, grain boundary ferrite precipitation, pearlite block size and sub-grain boundaries misorientation. It was found that implementing soft reduction technology can reduce void defects, specifically by mitigating the effects of prior austenite grain boundary and pearlite colony boundary on void initiation. Additionally, increasing reduction amounts were associated with an increase in void number, size, and complexity, while smaller reduction amounts could effectively compensate for solidification shrinkage voids.
In this work, void formation in medium carbon ferrite-pearlite steel is investigated with soft reduction (SR) technology as regards its initiation sites and governing factors: prior austenite grain size, grain boundary ferrite (GB-alpha) precipitation, pearlite block size and sub-grain boundaries misorientation. The small and tightly packed pearlite colonies attached with GB-alpha and irregular broken cementite lamellae provide an easier path for void initiation at prior austenite grain boundary (PAGB) and pearlite colony boundary respectively. 3-dimensional void morphology and void size including porosities with different SR parameters were characterized via X-ray computed tomography (XCT). The total number of voids, their sizes, and shape complexity are increased by increasing reduction amount, and serious void defects are evident without the implementation of SR technology. The size of shrinkage void increases with increasing reduction amount, which is twice without implementation of SR technology as compared with the high reduction amount of 6 mm. The total number of voids and their sizes was less along with porosities at minimum reduction amounts of 2 mm and 4 mm, which are small enough to compensate the solidification shrinkage voids. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available