4.7 Article

A FAIR and AI-ready Higgs boson decay dataset

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-01109-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research within U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science [DE-SC0021258, DE-SC0021395, DE-SC0021225, DESC0021396]
  2. Halcoglu Data Science Fellowship
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0021225, DE-SC0021258, DE-SC0021395] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides a domain-agnostic assessment guide to evaluate the adherence of datasets to the principles of findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (FAIR). Using an open simulated dataset produced by the CMS Collaboration as an example, the guide is demonstrated to assess the FAIRness of the dataset.
To enable the reusability of massive scientific datasets by humans and machines, researchers aim to adhere to the principles of findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (FAIR) for data and artificial intelligence (AI) models. This article provides a domain-agnostic, step-by-step assessment guide to evaluate whether or not a given dataset meets these principles. We demonstrate how to use this guide to evaluate the FAIRness of an open simulated dataset produced by the CMS Collaboration at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. This dataset consists of Higgs boson decays and quark and gluon background, and is available through the CERN Open Data Portal. We use additional available tools to assess the FAIRness of this dataset, and incorporate feedback from members of the FAIR community to validate our results. This article is accompanied by a Jupyter notebook to visualize and explore this dataset. This study marks the first in a planned series of articles that will guide scientists in the creation of FAIR AI models and datasets in high energy particle physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available