A Comparative Study about Vertical Accuracy of Four Freely Available Digital Elevation Models: A Case Study in the Balsas River Watershed, Brazil
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A Comparative Study about Vertical Accuracy of Four Freely Available Digital Elevation Models: A Case Study in the Balsas River Watershed, Brazil
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 106
Publisher
MDPI AG
Online
2022-02-03
DOI
10.3390/ijgi11020106
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Accuracy Assessment of Digital Elevation Models (DEMs): A Critical Review of Practices of the Past Three Decades
- (2020) José L. Mesa-Mingorance et al. Remote Sensing
- Evaluating the Effects of Digital Elevation Models in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Rangamati District, Bangladesh
- (2020) Yasin Wahid Rabby et al. Remote Sensing
- A Comparison of Two Machine Learning Classification Methods for Remote Sensing Predictive Modeling of the Forest Fire in the North-Eastern Siberia
- (2020) Piotr Janiec et al. Remote Sensing
- European Digital Elevation Model Validation against Extensive Global Navigation Satellite Systems Data and Comparison with SRTM DEM and ASTER GDEM in Central Macedonia (Greece)
- (2019) Antonios Mouratidis et al. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
- Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Using Statistical- and Artificial Intelligence-based FR–RF Integrated Model and Multiresolution DEMs
- (2019) Arabameri et al. Remote Sensing
- Accuracy assessment of the global TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model with GPS data
- (2018) Birgit Wessel et al. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING
- A suite of global, cross-scale topographic variables for environmental and biodiversity modeling
- (2018) Giuseppe Amatulli et al. Scientific Data
- Generation and performance assessment of the global TanDEM-X digital elevation model
- (2017) Paola Rizzoli et al. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING
- Vertical accuracy evaluation of SRTM-GL1, GDEM-V2, AW3D30 and CartoDEM-V3.1 of 30-m resolution with dual frequency GNSS for lower Tapi Basin India
- (2017) Akshay O. Jain et al. Geocarto International
- Evaluation of Recently Released Open Global Digital Elevation Models of Hubei, China
- (2017) Zhihua Hu et al. Remote Sensing
- Accuracy assessment of SRTM v4 and ASTER GDEM v2 over the Altiplano watershed using ICESat/GLAS data
- (2015) F. Satgé et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
- Accuracy validation and comparison of global digital elevation models over Croatia
- (2015) Matej Varga et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
- DEM generation with UAV Photogrammetry and accuracy analysis in Sahitler hill
- (2015) M. Uysal et al. MEASUREMENT
- Suitability of spaceborne digital elevation models of different scales in topographic analysis: an example from Kerala, India
- (2014) Jobin Thomas et al. Environmental Earth Sciences
- Digital elevation model validation with no ground control: application to the topodata dem in Brazil
- (2014) Laurent Polidori et al. BOLETIM DE CIENCIAS GEODESICAS
- External Validation of the ASTER GDEM2, GMTED2010 and CGIAR-CSI- SRTM v4.1 Free Access Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) in Tunisia and Algeria
- (2014) Djamel Athmania et al. Remote Sensing
- Sensitivity of digital elevation models: The scenario from two tropical mountain river basins of the Western Ghats, India
- (2014) Jobin Thomas et al. Geoscience Frontiers
- Assessing ecological risk through automated drainage extraction and watershed delineation
- (2011) Luiz Rogério Mantelli et al. Ecological Informatics
- Effectiveness of SRTM and ALOS-PALSAR data for identifying morphostructural lineaments in northeastern Brazil
- (2011) Clódis De Oliveira Andrades Filho et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started