4.2 Review

Sfrp4 and the Biology of Cortical Bone

Journal

CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 153-161

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11914-022-00727-w

Keywords

Cortical bone; Wnt; Sfrp4; Periosteum; Cathepsin K periosteal stem cells; Pyle disease

Funding

  1. NIH-NIDCR [R56DE028299, R01DE029615]
  2. Milton Fund, Office of the Vice Provost for Research Harvard University
  3. NIH-NIAMS Grant [R01AR064724]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the role of Sfrp4 in cortical bone growth, expansion, and homeostasis. Loss-of-function mutations in SFRP4 lead to the skeletal disorder Pyle disease, and Sfrp4 has different regulatory functions on the endosteum and periosteum.
Purpose of Review Periosteal apposition and endosteal remodeling regulate cortical bone expansion and thickness, both critical determinants of bone strength. Yet, the cellular characteristics and local or paracrine factors that regulate the periosteum and endosteum remain largely elusive. Here we discuss novel insights in cortical bone growth, expansion, and homeostasis, provided by the study of Secreted Frizzled Receptor Protein 4 (Sfrp4), a decoy receptor for Wnt ligands. Recent Findings SFRP4 loss-of function mutations cause Pyle disease, a rare skeletal disorder characterized by cortical bone thinning and increased fragility fractures despite increased trabecular bone density. On the endosteal surface, Sfrp4-mediated repression of non-canonical Wnt signaling regulates endosteal resorption. On the periosteum, Sfrp4 identifies as a critical functional mediator of periosteal stem cell/progenitor expansion and differentiation. Analysis of signaling pathways regulating skeletal stem cells/progenitors provides an opportunity to advance our understanding of the mechanisms involved in cortical bone biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available