4.3 Review

Artificial intelligence in thoracic surgery: a narrative review

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 6963-6975

Publisher

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-761

Keywords

Artificial intelligence (AI); thoracic surgery; machine learning; lung resection; perioperative medicine

Funding

  1. University of Parma MADA-MED
  2. FSE (Fondo Sociale Europeo) [G.R. 589/2019-Rif. PA 2019-11449/RER]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviewed the current applications of artificial intelligence in thoracic surgery, highlighting the promising results of machine learning methods in improving perioperative evaluation, decision-making process, surgical performance, and operating room scheduling. However, further studies and specific consensus guidelines are needed to validate these technologies for daily common practice, considering concerns surrounding data supply, protection, and transparency.
Objective: The aim of this article is to review the current applications of artificial intelligence in thoracic surgery, from diagnosis and pulmonary disease management, to preoperative risk-assessment, surgical planning, and outcomes prediction. Background: Artificial intelligence implementation in healthcare settings is rapidly growing, though its widespread use in clinical practice is still limited. The employment of machine learning algorithms in thoracic surgery is wide-ranging, including all steps of the clinical pathway. Methods: We performed a narrative review of the literature on Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane databases, including all the relevant studies published in the last ten years, until March 2021. Conclusion: Machine learning methods are promising encouraging results throughout the key issues of thoracic surgery, both clinical, organizational, and educational. Artificial intelligence-based technologies showed remarkable efficacy to improve the perioperative evaluation of the patient, to assist the decisionmaking process, to enhance the surgical performance, and to optimize the operating room scheduling. Still, some concern remains about data supply, protection, and transparency, thus further studies and specific consensus guidelines are needed to validate these technologies for daily common practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available