4.7 Review

Efficacy and Safety of Various Treatments for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.709501

Keywords

proliferative diabetic retinopathy; systematic review; network meta-analysis; laser photocoagulation; anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor)

Funding

  1. Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences [2016220101000791]
  2. Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province [20200404161YY]
  3. Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province (Collaborative Fund project) [YDZJ202101ZYTS098]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of visual impairment and blindness, particularly proliferative diabetic retinopathy at severe stages. A systematic network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate various treatments for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Results indicated that ranibizumab alone and laser + ranibizumab were the most effective in improving visual scores, with decreased central retinal thickness observed in the laser combined with ranibizumab group. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to verify correlations and ensure longer-term efficacy.
Diabetic retinopathy is the main cause of visual impairment and blindness. The proliferative diabetic retinopathy at the severe stage of diabetic retinopathy is more harmful to vision and even leads to total blindness. To evaluate the visual acuity, central retinal thickness, and adverse reactions of various treatments for proliferative diabetic retinopathy through a systematic network meta-analysis. The relevant research published in English or Chinese from January 1, 2011, to February 1, 2021, was systematically searched by using PubMed, science network, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and other electronic databases. A total of 15 studies were selected, including 3,222 eyes of PDR patients. Our results show that in terms of visual score improvement, ranibizumab alone (69.90%) and laser + ranibizumab (67.90%) are the best. However, if the groups were grouped again according to the dose and times of ranibizumab injection, the results showed that 0.5 mg ranibizumab injection per month (58.0%) had the best effect on vision improvement. For the change of central retinal thickness, the thickness decreased the most after the laser combined with ranibizumab (96.5%). After the same subgroup analysis, the results were further refined into the best effect of laser combined with 0.3 mg ranibizumab per quarter (72.7%). In addition, our analysis of complications also showed that the overall incidence of adverse reactions of PRP (11.1 +/- 12.4, %) was greater than that of ranibizumab (10.6 +/- 13.0, %). However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up using standard methods are still needed to verify the correlation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available