4.5 Review

Carbon Nanotube Membranes in Water Treatment Applications

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.202101260

Keywords

buckypaper; carbon nanotubes; chemical modification; membranes; water treatment

Funding

  1. University of Trieste
  2. INSTM
  3. Spanish State Research Agency Grant [MDM-2017-0720]
  4. ISCIII [CD18/00145]
  5. Universita degli Studi di Trieste within the CRUI-CARE agreement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of carbon nanotube-based membranes in water treatment, covering different types of CNT-based membranes and their fabrication methods. It also emphasizes on methodologies for tailoring membrane properties and behavior, especially focusing on chemical modification of the CNT surface. Additionally, common applications of CNT-based membranes in water treatment and their limitations are briefly outlined.
Carbon nanotube (CNT)-based membranes combine the promising properties of CNTs with the advantages of membrane separation technologies, offering enhanced membrane performance in terms of permeability and selectivity. This review looks at the existing membrane architectures based on CNTs and their main advantages and disadvantages for water treatment applications. The different types of CNT-based membranes that are reported in the literature are highlighted, as well as their corresponding fabrication methods. Available methodologies for tailoring the final membrane properties and behavior are thoroughly discussed, making special emphasis in chemical modification of the CNT surface. Finally, the most common applications of CNT-based membranes in water treatment are reviewed, including seawater or brine desalination, oil-water separation, removal of heavy metals, and organic pollutants. The main limitations and perspectives of CNT-based membranes are also briefly outlined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available