4.6 Article

Understanding the Social Licence of Carbon Farming in the Australian Rangelands

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14010174

Keywords

carbon farming; sequestration; trust; equity; SLO; rangelands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon farming has expanded in Australia's rangelands, but its long-term viability depends on obtaining and maintaining a social licence to operate. This study reveals that policy complexity and uncertainty are the greatest threats to the social licence of carbon farming, but participatory policy development, alignment with local values, and trust-building at the local level can enhance the social licence.
Carbon farming has expanded in Australia's rangelands over recent years, incentivised under the Australian Government's Emissions Reduction Fund. While this has largely been driven by economic benefits for landholders, the long-term viability of the carbon farming industry depends on its ability to obtain and maintain a social licence to operate in affected communities. Using a combination of survey, interview and focus group methods, involving key stakeholders in far-western New South Wales (NSW), this study reveals that the greatest threat to the social licence of carbon farming is the lack of confidence in governance related to policy complexity and uncertainty. Procedural fairness is a relative strength because of the involvement of trusted community members, and the trust-building strategies employed by the aggregators who recruit landholders to carbon farming. Perceptions of distributional fairness are strengthened by the benefits beginning to flow through rangeland communities, but are weakened by concerns around the equity of eligibility and the land management rules. A focus on participatory policy development, aligning rules with local values and local-scale trust building, is required in order to enhance the social licence for carbon farming in the NSW rangelands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available