4.6 Article

Cardiovascular disorders associated with naloxone monotherapy and in fixed-dose combination with opioids: Data from international safety surveillance

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 212, Issue -, Pages 360-363

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.03.079

Keywords

Naloxone; Cardiovascular disorders

Funding

  1. Develco Pharma Suisse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The widespread use of opioids has resulted in sharp rise of associated complications, particularly opioid-indfical constipation (01C). Opioid receptor antagonists have been proposed to treat OIC, but could precipitate rapid opioid withdrawal. As cardiovascular safety data are lacking, we assessed disproportionate reporting of adverse cardiac events associated with naloxone across large, international pharmacovigilance systems. Methods: Post-marketing data from the World Health Organization (WHO) and FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) were evaluated for naloxone and the synthetic opioids oxycodone and tilidine. The proportional reporting ratio (PRR), a measure of reporting frequency analogous to an odds ratio, was assessed. The primary outcome was reporting frequency of the MedDRA System Organ Class (SOC) 'Cardiac Disorders for naloxone alone and in fixed-dose combination with opioids. Opioid mono-preparations served as quasi-experimental controls. A PRR greater than 2.0 was considered significant. Results: In total, 14,827,374 million adverse drug event reports were reviewed. In WHO, there were 1757 reports of SOC cardiac disorders among 10,866 total reports for oxycodone (PRR 238 [95% Cl 228-2A), chi(2) = 15041). For oxycodone-naluxune there were 43/453 reports of SOC cardiac disorders (PRR1A5 [95% C11.09-1.92, chi(2) 6.4]). Fur he synthetic opioid tilidine there were 13/179 reports (PRR 1.13 [95% Cl 0.67-1.91, chi(2) 0.21) and fur tilidine-naluxune, 30/505 reports (PRR 0.92 [95% Cl 0.65-1.31, chi(2) 0.2]). In FAERS, the PRR for SOC cardiac disorders was 0.95 [95% C10.89-1.01, chi(2) 2.1] for naloxone (all administration routes) and 1.16 [95% CI 0.93-1A5, chi(2) = 1.3] for naloxone (oral only). In comparison, the PRR was 1.66 [95% CII.63-1.69, chi(2) = 4278] for oxycodone and 152 [C11.28-1.80, chi(2) = 1500] fur uxycodune-naluxune. Conclusions: Available pharmacovigilance data do nut suggest disproportionate reporting of adverse iardiovasujlar events fur opioid antagonists used W treat OIC. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available