4.8 Article

Plasticity of olfactory bulb inputs mediated by dendritic NMDA-spikes in rodent piriform cortex

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.70383

Keywords

piriform cortex; dendrites; NMDA-spikes; LTP; odor processing; optogenetics; Mouse; Rat

Categories

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation
  2. Prince Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Contrary to previous beliefs, this study found that synaptic plasticity in LOT synapses is stronger and more robust than in IC synapses when receiving specific stimulation, suggesting a self-potentiating mechanism for odor information via NMDA-spikes. Additionally, association between olfactory and contextual information through STDP mechanisms provides cognitive and emotional value to odors.
The piriform cortex (PCx) is essential for learning of odor information. The current view postulates that odor learning in the PCx is mainly due to plasticity in intracortical (IC) synapses, while odor information from the olfactory bulb carried via the lateral olfactory tract (LOT) is 'hardwired.' Here, we revisit this notion by studying location- and pathway-dependent plasticity rules. We find that in contrast to the prevailing view, synaptic and optogenetically activated LOT synapses undergo strong and robust long-term potentiation (LTP) mediated by only a few local NMDA-spikes delivered at theta frequency, while global spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) protocols failed to induce LTP in these distal synapses. In contrast, IC synapses in apical and basal dendrites undergo plasticity with both NMDA-spikes and STDP protocols but to a smaller extent compared with LOT synapses. These results are consistent with a self-potentiating mechanism of odor information via NMDA-spikes that can form branch-specific memory traces of odors that can further associate with contextual IC information via STDP mechanisms to provide cognitive and emotional value to odors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available