4.7 Article

A Lightweight Detection Model for SAR Aircraft in a Complex Environment

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13245020

Keywords

synthetic aperture radar; aircraft detection; scattering information; reuse information; lightweight detection model

Funding

  1. Shenzhen Science and Technology Program [KQTD20190929172704911]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A lightweight detection model (LDM) is proposed for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) aircraft detection, incorporating reuse block (RB) and information correction block (ICB) to extract aircraft features, improve detection accuracy, and enhance processing speed by suppressing interference in complex environments. Experiments on the SAR aircraft detection dataset show superior average precision and faster detection time compared to other methods.
Recently, deep learning has been widely used in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) aircraft detection. However, the complex environment of the airport-consider the boarding bridges, for instance-greatly interferes with aircraft detection. Besides, the detection speed is also an important indicator in practical applications. To alleviate these problems, we propose a lightweight detection model (LDM), mainly including a reuse block (RB) and an information correction block (ICB) based on the Yolov3 framework. The RB module helps the neural network extract rich aircraft features by aggregating multi-layer information. While the RB module brings more effective information, there is also redundant and useless information aggregated by the reuse block, which is harmful to detection precision. Therefore, to accurately extract more aircraft features, we propose an ICB module combining scattering mechanism characteristics by extracting the gray features and enhancing spatial information, which helps suppress interference in a complex environment and redundant information. Finally, we conducted a series of experiments on the SAR aircraft detection dataset (SAR-ADD). The average precision was 0.6954, which is superior to the precision values achieved by other methods. In addition, the average detection time of LDM was only 6.38 ms, making it much faster than other methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available