Additional lateral plate fixation has no effect to prevent cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Additional lateral plate fixation has no effect to prevent cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2021-10-12
DOI
10.1186/s13018-021-02725-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Mini-invasive bilateral transfacet screw fixation with reconstruction of the neural arch for lumbar stenosis: A two centre case series
- (2021) Michele Bochicchio et al. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND
- Impact of endplate-implant area mismatch on rates and grades of subsidence following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: an analysis of 623 levels
- (2020) Nitin Agarwal et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Development and Application of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
- (2020) Renjie Li et al. Orthopaedic Surgery
- Longitudinal investigation of the endplate cystic lesion effect on oblique lumbar interbody fusion
- (2019) Guang-Xun Lin et al. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
- Minimally invasive multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion with posterior column osteotomy compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy for adult spinal deformity
- (2019) Ki Young Lee et al. Spine Journal
- Graft subsidence as a predictor of revision surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion
- (2018) Zachary J. Tempel et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Cage Subsidence and Fusion Rate in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion with and without Fixation
- (2018) Enliang Chen et al. World Neurosurgery
- Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1–L5 (OLIF25) and at L5–S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates
- (2017) Kamal R.M. Woods et al. Spine Journal
- The Oblique Anterolateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Access to the Lumbar Spine With Few Early Complications
- (2016) Christoph Mehren et al. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
- Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation
- (2016) Marco T. Reis et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis
- (2015) Jun Sato et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Assessment and classification of subsidence after lateral interbody fusion using serial computed tomography
- (2015) Gregory M. Malham et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Biomechanics of lateral lumbar interbody fusion constructs with lateral and posterior plate fixation
- (2014) Guy R. Fogel et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion
- (2013) Luis Marchi et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages
- (2013) Aniruddh N. Nayak et al. Spine Journal
- Complications of lateral plating in the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach
- (2011) Tien V. Le et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Biomechanical Analysis and Review of Lateral Lumbar Fusion Constructs
- (2010) Andrew Cappuccino et al. SPINE
- Vertebral body fracture after anterolateral instrumentation and interbody fusion in two osteoporotic patients
- (2010) Karan Dua et al. Spine Journal
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started