4.7 Article

InSAR data reveal that the largest hydraulic fracturing-induced earthquake in Canada, to date, is a slow-slip event

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06129-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canada First Research Excellence Fund
  2. NSERC Discovery Grant [RGPIN/03823-2017]
  3. Guangdong Province Introduced Innovative R&D Team of Geological Processes and Natural Disasters around the South China Sea [2016ZT06N331]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that up to magnitude 5.0 slow slip events (SSEs) occurred during hydraulic fracturing (HF) operations in northwestern Canada, as confirmed by ground-deformation observations and reported deformation of the well casing. Although the magnitude 5.0 SSE exceeded the magnitude of the largest induced earthquake in the region, it went undetected by seismograph networks. These observed SSEs occurred within a buried thrust belt and exhibited similar magnitude and duration as SSEs in unbounded natural systems like subduction zones.
For tectonic earthquakes, slip rate spans a continuum from creep to supershear earthquakes, where slow slip events (SSEs) are important in releasing stress without radiating damaging seismic energy. Industrial-scale subsurface fluid injection has caused induced earthquakes, but the role of SSEs in fault activation is currently unclear. Ground-deformation observations, measured by satellite radar, show that SSEs up to magnitude 5.0 occurred during hydraulic fracturing (HF) operations in northwestern Canada, corroborated by reported deformation of the steel well casing. Although the magnitude 5.0 SSE exceeded the magnitude of the largest induced earthquake in this region (magnitude 4.55), it was undetected by seismograph networks. The observed SSEs occurred within a buried thrust belt and their magnitude and duration are consistent with scaling behavior of SSEs in unbounded natural systems, e.g. slab interfaces in subduction zones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available