4.7 Article

Changes in rays' swimming stability due to the phase difference between left and right pectoral fin movements

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05317-5

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effects of phase differences in pectoral fin movements on the swimming of rays using fluid analysis methods. The results show that a phase difference affects swimming stability and maneuverability but not propulsive efficiency. The study suggests that the phase difference in pectoral fin movements is crucial for the swimming of rays, and rays adjust the phase difference between the left and right pectoral fins to suit their purpose.
Swimming motions of rays that swim using undulation locomotion are not always symmetrical; there may be a phase difference between the left and right pectoral fins. However, few studies on the swimming of rays have mentioned left and right pectoral fin movements. Moreover, the effects of movements of the left and right pectoral fins on swimming have not been clarified. This paper describes a computational study of phase differences of pectoral fin movements in the swimming of rays with the validity of fluid analysis methods. The movement and shape of the ray were made based on previous biological research and pictures. An overset grid was used to reproduce the ray's complex motions. The analysis was performed under four phase difference conditions: 0 T (T is the period), 0.25 T, 0.5 T, and 0.75 T. The results show that a phase difference between the left and right pectoral fin movements affects swimming stability and maneuverability but not propulsive efficiency. We suggest that the phase difference in pectoral fin movements is essential for the swimming of rays, and rays adjust the phase difference between the movement of the left and right pectoral fins to suit their purpose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available