4.7 Article

A structured ICA-based process for removing auditory evoked potentials

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05397-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [P01AG031720]
  2. Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy (CURE)
  3. NIH [R24AG06142, P01 AG031720, R01 MH115949, R01AG060987, P01 AG031720-06A1]
  4. Football Players Health Study (FPHS) at Harvard University
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. Barcelona Brain Health Initiative (La Caixa)
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Academic Affiliations Advanced Fellowship Program in Mental Illness Research and Treatment
  8. Medical Research Service of the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System
  9. Department of Veterans Affairs Sierra-Pacific Data Science Fellowship
  10. Barcelona Brain Health Initiative (Institute Guttmann)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to separate the auditory evoked potential (AEP) from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked potentials (TEPs) using independent component analysis (ICA) and evaluate the effectiveness of this procedure. The results show that removing AEP significantly reduces the global and local mean field power of TEPs and decreases the similarity between TEPs of different subjects and stimulation conditions. The residual TEPs have unique characteristics that are different from AEPs and may provide insights into TMS-evoked potentials and other modulated oscillatory dynamics.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked potentials (TEPs), recorded using electroencephalography (EEG), reflect a combination of TMS-induced cortical activity and multi-sensory responses to TMS. The auditory evoked potential (AEP) is a high-amplitude sensory potential-evoked by the click sound produced by every TMS pulse-that can dominate the TEP and obscure observation of other neural components. The AEP is peripherally evoked and therefore should not be stimulation site specific. We address the problem of disentangling the peripherally evoked AEP of the TEP from components evoked by cortical stimulation and ask whether removal of AEP enables more accurate isolation of TEP. We hypothesized that isolation of the AEP using Independent Components Analysis (ICA) would reveal features that are stimulation site specific and unique individual features. In order to improve the effectiveness of ICA for removal of AEP from the TEP, and thus more clearly separate the transcranial-evoked and non-specific TMS-modulated potentials, we merged sham and active TMS datasets representing multiple stimulation conditions, removed the resulting AEP component, and evaluated performance across different sham protocols and clinical populations using reduction in Global and Local Mean Field Power (GMFP/LMFP) and cosine similarity analysis. We show that removing AEPs significantly reduced GMFP and LMFP in the post-stimulation TEP (14 to 400 ms), driven by time windows consistent with the N100 and P200 temporal characteristics of AEPs. Cosine similarity analysis supports that removing AEPs reduces TEP similarity between subjects and reduces TEP similarity between stimulation conditions. Similarity is reduced most in a mid-latency window consistent with the N100 time-course, but nevertheless remains high in this time window. Residual TEP in this window has a time-course and topography unique from AEPs, which follow-up exploratory analyses suggest could be a modulation in the alpha band that is not stimulation site specific but is unique to individual subject. We show, using two datasets and two implementations of sham, evidence in cortical topography, TEP time-course, GMFP/LMFP and cosine similarity analyses that this procedure is effective and conservative in removing the AEP from TEP, and may thus better isolate TMS-evoked activity. We show TEP remaining in early, mid and late latencies. The early response is site and subject specific. Later response may be consistent with TMS-modulated alpha activity that is not site specific but is unique to the individual. TEP remaining after removal of AEP is unique and can provide insight into TMS-evoked potentials and other modulated oscillatory dynamics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available