4.5 Review

Neoadjuvant therapy vs. upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer: An update on a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

BIOSCIENCE TRENDS
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 365-373

Publisher

IRCA-BSSA
DOI: 10.5582/bst.2021.01459

Keywords

neoadjuvant therapy; resectable; pancreatic; neoplasm; prognosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been shown to increase R0 resection rate and reduce positive lymph node rate compared to upfront surgery (US), although it does not significantly improve overall survival. Additional large clinical studies are needed to determine whether NAT is superior to US in the management of resectable pancreatic cancer.
The effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains controversial in the treatment of pancreatic cancer (PC). Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to investigate the clinical differences between NAT and upfront surgery (US) in resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC). Eligible studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The endpoints assessed were R0 resection rate, pathological T stage < 2 rate, positive lymph node rate, and overall survival. A total of 4,588 potentially relevant studies were identified, and 13 studies were included in this study. In patients with RPC, this meta-analysis showed that NAT presented an increased R0 resection rate, pathological T stage < 2 rate, and a remarkably reduced positive lymph node rate compared to US. However, patients receiving NAT did not result in a significantly increased overall survival. These findings supported the application of NAT, especially as a patient selection strategy, in the management of RPC. Additional large clinical studies are needed to determine whether NAT is superior to US.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available