4.6 Article

A Conceptual Framework for Life-Cycle Health Technology Assessment

Journal

VALUE IN HEALTH
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 1116-1123

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1373

Keywords

economic evaluation; health technology assessment; life-cycle; research oriented market access; value of information

Funding

  1. Government of Alberta [005527, 005841, 008491, 013211]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The life-cycle health technology assessment (LC-HTA) framework addresses the challenges faced by standard HTA processes, such as decision uncertainty and lack of adaptability to new evidence. LC-HTA introduces changes in methods, such as risk-based pricing and research-oriented managed access, to minimize analytical time and improve decision certainty. The framework also extends value-of-information methods and includes contractually embedded decision rules to simplify reassessment and improve responsiveness to evolving evidence.
Objectives: Health technology assessment (HTA) uses evidence appraisal and synthesis with economic evaluation to inform adoption decisions. Standard HTA processes sometimes struggle to (1) support decisions that involve significant uncertainty and (2) encourage continued generation of and adaptation to new evidence. We propose the life-cycle (LC)-HTA framework, addressing these challenges by providing additional tools to decision makers and improving outcomes for all stakeholders. Methods: Under the LC-HTA framework, HTA processes align to LC management. LC-HTA introduces changes in HTA methods to minimize analytic time while optimizing decision certainty. Where decision uncertainty exists, we recommend risk-based pricing and research-oriented managed access (ROMA). Contractual procurement agreements define the terms of reassessment and provide additional decision options to HTA agencies. LC-HTA extends value-of-information methods to inform ROMA agreements, leveraging routine, administrative data, and registries to reduce uncertainty. Results: LC-HTA enables the adoption of high-value high-risk innovations while improving health system sustainability through risk-sharing and reducing uncertainty. Responsiveness to evolving evidence is improved through contractually embedded decision rules to simplify reassessment. ROMA allows conditional adoption to obtain additional information, with confidence that the net value of that adoption decision is positive. Conclusions: The LC-HTA framework improves outcomes for patients, sponsors, and payers. Patients benefit through earlier access to new technologies. Payers increase the value of the technologies they invest in and gain mechanisms to review investments. Sponsors benefit through greater certainty in outcomes related to their investment, swifter access to markets, and greater opportunities to demonstrate value.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available