4.7 Article

Web crippling of cold-formed steel built-up box sections

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108789

Keywords

Web crippling; Built-up box sections; Screw arrangements; Experiments; Numerical modelling; Direct strength method

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research focuses on experiments, numerical simulations, and design of cold-formed steel (CFS) built-up box sections that fail due to web crippling. The effects of screw arrangements on web crippling are studied through experiments and numerical simulations, and two new design methods are proposed.
This research focused on the experiments, numerical simulations and design of cold-formed steel (CFS) built-up box sections failed by web crippling. The built-up box sections were formed by fastening two equalsized unlipped channel sections face-to-face by self-tapping screws. Thirty-five web crippling tests are firstly described, which were conducted under Interior-Two-Flange (ITF), End-Two-Flange (ETF), Interior-One-Flange (IOF) and End-One-Flange (EOF) loading cases. The number and location of screws were varied along the channel flange width to study the influences of screw arrangements. The specimens were loaded along the major axis and the minor axis. Numerical simulations were also conducted. The experimental results were used in the development and validation of nonlinear finite element (FE) models. After validation, the validated numerical models were used for a comprehensive parametric investigation accounting for various cross-section dimensions, bearing lengths and screw arrangements. The experimental and numerical data were used to evaluate the design methods provided in the current design codes. Finally, two different design methods were proposed and assessed through the reliability analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available