4.3 Article

Cardiovascular risk reduction in hypertension: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers. Where are we up to?

Journal

INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 364-372

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imj.12975

Keywords

angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; angiotensin receptor antagonist; cardiovascular diseases; risk assessment; hypertension

Funding

  1. Abbott
  2. Alphapharm
  3. Aspen
  4. Astra Zeneca
  5. Bayer
  6. Biotronik
  7. Boehringer Ingleheim
  8. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  9. Cube
  10. CSL
  11. General Electric
  12. Glaxo Smith Kline
  13. Guidant
  14. Janssen-Cilag
  15. Johnson and Johnson
  16. Medimark
  17. Medtronic
  18. Menarini
  19. Merck Sharp and Dohme
  20. Mylan
  21. Novartis
  22. Ogilvy
  23. Pfizer
  24. Phillips
  25. Roche
  26. Sanofi
  27. Servier
  28. St Jude
  29. Sunshine Heart
  30. Vifor
  31. Amgen
  32. Sanofi-Aventis
  33. Solvay
  34. Bristol Myer Squibb
  35. Boehringer Ingelheim
  36. Baxter
  37. Fresenius Medical
  38. Hoffman-La Roche
  39. Sandoz
  40. Takeda

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previously, management of hypertension has concentrated on lowering elevated blood pressure. However, the target has shifted to reducing absolute cardiovascular (CV) risk. It is estimated that two in three Australian adults have three or more CV risk factors at the same time. Moderate reductions in several risk factors can, therefore, be more effective than major reductions in one. When managing hypertension, therapy should be focused on medications with the strongest evidence for CV event reduction, substituting alternatives only when a primary choice is not appropriate. Hypertension management guidelines categorise angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) interchangeably as first-line treatments in uncomplicated hypertension. These medications have different mechanisms of action and quite different evidence bases. They are not interchangeable and their prescription should be based on clinical evidence. Despite this, currently ARB prescriptions are increasing at a higher rate than those for ACEI and other antihypertensive classes. Evidence that ACEI therapy prevents CV events and death, in patients with coronary artery disease or multiple CV risk factors, emerged from the European trial on reduction of cardiac events with perindopril in stable coronary artery disease (EUROPA) and Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) trials respectively. The consistent benefit has been demonstrated in meta-analyses. The clinical trial data for ARB are less consistent, particularly regarding CV outcomes and mortality benefit. The evidence supports the use of ACEI (Class 1a) compared with ARB despite current prescribing trends.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available