4.3 Article

Indications of IMRT, PRT and CIRT for HCC from comparisons of dosimetry and normal tissue complication possibility

Journal

STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
Volume 198, Issue 4, Pages 361-369

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01854-6

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy; Proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy; Radiation-induced liver disease; Radiotherapy planning; computer-assisted

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proton radiotherapy (PRT) and carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) provide better liver sparing compared to intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT). IMRT can effectively treat HCC with a diameter up to 7.9 cm, while PRT can treat up to 13.2 cm and CIRT up to 14.8 cm.
Purpose To identify the indications for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) irradiated by intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT), proton radiotherapy (PRT) or carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) by comparing of dosimetric parameters and incidences of classic radiation-induced liver disease (RILD). Methods In all, 40 HCCs were divided into group A (tumors located > 1 cm away from gastrointestinal [GI] tract), and group B (tumors located < 1 cm away from GI tract). The prescribed curative doses were 60 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 10 fractions for group A, and 67.5 Gy (RBE) in 15 fractions for group B. IMRT, PRT and CIRT plans were separately generated to reach the curative doses and coverage. Dosimetric parameters evaluated were mean dose to normal liver (MDTNL) and the volume of normal liver receiving more than 1 Gy (RBE) (V1). Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model was used to determine the incidences of classic RILD, and Power model of non-linear regression, to estimate the tumor volume that could be irradiated with the curative doses within dose constraint of MDTNL. Results With comparable target doses, the MDTNL (Gy [RBE]) were 18.8 +/- 3.7, 13.5 +/- 3.1 and 12.8 +/- 2.7 in group A and 24.9 +/- 7.1, 18.2 +/- 3.7 and 17.5 +/- 3.7 in group B, respectively, for IMRT, PRT and CIRT. The classic RILD incidences (%) were 22.3 +/- 30.0 in IMRT, 2.3 +/- 4.9 in PRT and 1.2 +/- 2.4 in CIRT. V1 (%) were 89.9 +/- 8.8, 43.0 +/- 10.2 and 45.9 +/- 8.8, respectively, for IMRT, PRT and CIRT. Conclusions PRT and CIRT could spare the liver more than IMRT. IMRT could deliver the curative doses to HCC up to a diameter of 7.9 cm; PRT, up to 13.2 cm; and CIRT, up to 14.8 cm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available