4.7 Article

Fatty acids composition in yellow-legged (Larus michahellis) and lesser black-backed (Larus fuscus) gulls from natural and urban habitats in relation to the ingestion of anthropogenic materials

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 809, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151093

Keywords

Urbanization; Laridae; Diet analysis; Nutritional composition; Debris ingestion; Urban gulls

Funding

  1. Portuguese national funds by the Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P. (FCT) [UIDB/04292/2020]
  2. Competitiveness and Internationalization Operational Programme and Regional Operational Programme of Lisbon, through FEDER [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-022127]
  3. FCT [SFRH/BD/118862/2016, POCI-01-0145FEDER-022127]
  4. University of Coimbra [IT057-18-7253]
  5. national funds (OE) [POCI-01-0145FEDER-022127]
  6. Portuguese national funds by the Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P. (FCT) (FCT/MTCES) [UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020]
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/118862/2016] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban habitats provide predictable food sources for opportunistic species like gulls, but the nutritional quality of human-derived food and the ingestion of anthropogenic debris may have physiological consequences for urban dwellers. This study compares the fatty acid composition of two gull species from different urbanization levels and explores the effects of ingested anthropogenic materials. The results show differences in gulls' diet quality among foraging habitats and suggest a diet-induced susceptibility to inflammation in highly urbanized areas. The study also emphasizes the need for further research on the long-term physiological effects and sub-lethal impacts of lower nutritional quality diet and anthropogenic material ingestion.
Urban habitats offer spatially and temporally predictable anthropogenic food sources for opportunistic species, such as several species of gulls that are known to exploit urban areas and take advantage of accessible and diverse food sources, reducing foraging time and energy expenditure. However, human-derived food may have a poorer nutritional quality than the typical natural food resources and foraging in urban habitats may increase birds' susceptibility of ingesting anthropogenic debris materials, with unknown physiological consequences for urban dwellers. Here we compare the fatty acids (FA) composition of two opportunistic gull species (the yellow-legged gull, Larus michahellis, and the lesser black-backed gull, Larus fuscus) from areas with different levels of urbanization, to assess differences in birds' diet quality among foraging habitats, and we investigate the effects of ingesting anthropogenic materials, a toxicological stressor, on gulls' FA composition. Using GC-MS, 23 FAs were identified in the adipose tissue of both gull species. Significant differences in gulls' FA composition were detected among the three urbanization levels, mainly due to physiologically important highly unsaturated FAs that had lower percentages in gulls from the most urbanized habitats, consistent with a diet based on anthropogenic food resources. The deficiency in omega (omega)-3 FAs and the higher omega-6: omega-3 FAs ratio in gulls from the most urbanized location may indicate a diet-induced susceptibility to inflammation. No significant differences in overall FA composition were detected between gull species. While we were unable to detect any effect of ingested anthropogenic materials on gulls' FA composition, these data constitute a valuable contribution to the limited FA literature in gulls. We encourage studies to explore the long-term physiological effects of the lower nutritional quality diet for urban dwellers, and to detect the sub-lethal impacts of the ingestion of anthropogenic materials. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available