Beyond CSI: Calibrating public beliefs about the reliability of forensic science through openness and transparency

Judges and forensic science education: A national survey

(2021) Brandon L. Garrett et al.   FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL

Public beliefs about the accuracy and importance of forensic evidence in the United States

(2020) Jacob Kaplan et al.   SCIENCE & JUSTICE

The effect of preregistration on trust in empirical research findings: results of a registered report

(2020) Sarahanne M. Field et al.   Royal Society Open Science

Verification Reports: A new article type at Cortex

(2020) Christopher D. Chambers   CORTEX

Juror appraisals of forensic evidence: Effects of blind proficiency and cross-examination

(2020) William E. Crozier et al.   FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL

How Cross-Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors’ Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence

(2019) William C. Thompson et al.   JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES

Beliefs about error rates and human judgment in forensic science

(2019) Gianni Ribeiro et al.   FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL

Perceptions and Estimates of Error Rates in Forensic Science: A Survey of Forensic Analysts

(2019) Daniel C. Murrie et al.   FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL

Scientific integrity in the forensic sciences: Consumerism, conflicts of interest, and transparency

(2019) Nicholas V. Passalacqua et al.   SCIENCE & JUSTICE

Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile

(2019) Brian A. Nosek et al.   TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES

Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices

(2019) Agnes S. Bali et al.   SCIENCE & JUSTICE

Correction: Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond

(2019) Christopher Allen et al.   PLOS BIOLOGY

Comparing Categorical and Probabilistic Fingerprint Evidence

(2018) Brandon Garrett et al.   JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES

Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution

(2018) Hannah Fraser et al.   PLoS One

The preregistration revolution

(2018) Brian A. Nosek et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Questionable, Objectionable or Criminal? Public Opinion on Data Fraud and Selective Reporting in Science

(2017) Justin T. Pickett et al.   SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS

1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility

(2016) Monya Baker   NATURE

Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings

(2016) Raymond Marquis et al.   SCIENCE & JUSTICE

Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency

(2016) Mallory C. Kidwell et al.   PLOS BIOLOGY

Difficulty in detecting discrepancies in a clinical trial report: 260-reader evaluation

(2015) Graham D Cole et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

The Reputational Consequences of Failed Replications and Wrongness Admission among Scientists

(2015) Adam K. Fetterman et al.   PLoS One

Replication effort provokes praise--and 'bullying' charges

(2014) J. Bohannon   SCIENCE

Recognizing, investigating and dealing with incomplete and biased reporting of clinical research: from Francis Bacon to the WHO

(2011) Kay Dickersin et al.   JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE

Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?

(2010) Richard L. Kravitz et al.   PLoS One

What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?

(2008) Sara Schroter et al.   JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE