4.5 Article

Geographic variation and temporal trends in management and outcomes of cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction in the United States

Journal

RESUSCITATION
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages 339-348

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.11.002

Keywords

Cardiac arrest; Acute myocardial infarction; Healthcare disparities; Geographic variation; Outcomes research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found significant regional disparities in the management and outcomes of AMI-CA. The West had a higher prevalence and more severe clinical conditions compared to the Northeast, Midwest, and South. Compared to the Northeast, the Midwest, West, and South had higher rates of coronary angiography, PCI, and MCS use, as well as higher in-hospital mortality.
Background: Limited studies have evaluated regional disparities in the care of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with cardiac arrest (CA). This study sought to evaluate 18-year national trends, resource utilization, and geographical variation in outcomes in AMI-CA admissions. Methods and results: Using the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2017), we identified adults with AMI and concomitant CA admitted to the United States census regions of Northeast, Midwest, South, and West. Clinical outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, use of coronary angiog-raphy, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), mechanical circulatory support (MCS), hospitalization costs and length of stay. Of 9,680,257 admissions for AMI, 494,083 (5.1%) had concomitant CA. The West (6.0%) had higher prevalence compared to the Northeast (4.4%), Midwest (5.0%), and South (5.1%), p < 0.001. Admissions in the West had higher rates of STEMI, cardiogenic shock, multiorgan failure, mechanical venti-lation, and hemodialysis. Northeast admissions had lower use of coronary angiography (52.0% vs. 67.9% vs. 60.9% vs. 61.5%), PCI (38.7% vs. 51.9% vs. 44.8% vs. 46.7%), and MCS (18.4% vs. 21.8% vs. 18.1%, vs. 20.0%) compared to the Midwest, West and South (all p < 0.001). Com-pared with the Northeast, adjusted in-hospital mortality was higher in the Midwest (odds ratio [OR] 1.06 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.03-1.08]), South (OR 1.11 [95% CI 1.09-1.13]) and highest in the West (OR 1.16 [95% CI 1.13-1.18]), all p < 0.001. Temporal trends showed a decline in in-hospital mortality except in the West, which showed a slight increase. Conclusions: There remain significant regional disparities in the management and outcomes of AMI-CA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available