4.7 Article

Performance measure of a multi-state flow network under reliability and maintenance cost considerations

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 215, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107822

Keywords

Multi-state flow network; Reliability; Maintenance cost; Capacity vector

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71601072, 61872126]
  2. Scientific and Technological Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission [KJQN201900634, KJQN201900649]
  3. Doctoral Project of Chongqing Federation of Social Science Circles [2019BS064]
  4. Planning Project of Human Social Science of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission [20SKGH069, 20SKGH061, 20SKGH063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a comprehensive performance indicator to measure the performance of multi-state flow networks, along with an algorithm to calculate this indicator. The algorithm iteratively separates capacity vectors and checks maintenance budget limits to improve efficiency, which is validated through numerical experiments.
In this paper, each edge in a multi-state flow network is characterized by both multi-valued capacities and a maintenance cost. Accordingly, the performance of a multi-state flow network is measured by capacity reliability as well as maintenance budget limit. An integrated performance indicator MR(d,b) is defined as the probability that a multi-state flow network can provide the required capacity level d while satisfying the maintenance budget limit b. An algorithm is developed to calculate MR(d,b) exactly. Unlike the exhaustive algorithm that enumerates each capacity vector one by one, the developed algorithm iteratively separates capacity vectors satisfying the required capacity level d from the universal space, and then checks whether they meet the maintenance budget limit b. Furthermore, the efficiency of the developed algorithm is validated via numerical experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available