4.4 Article

COMPARING ANALYSIS OF PRETREATMENT METHODS OF WOOD AND BONE MATERIALS FOR THE CHRONOLOGY OF PERIPHERAL BURIALS AT TUNNUG 1, TUVA REPUBLIC, RUSSIA

Journal

RADIOCARBON
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/RDC.2021.100

Keywords

burial mound; radiocarbon AMS dating; Tunnug; Tuva; ultrafiltration

Funding

  1. Excellence Initiative - Research University, The Silesian University of Technology [03/FSW18/0003-04/2019]
  2. Russian Geographical Society [N 53/04/2019]
  3. Society for the Exploration of EurAsia
  4. Russian Ministry of Culture [656-01-1-41/12-18, N 1205/12-20]
  5. Program of Fundamental Scientific Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences [0184-2019-0011]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation [P400PG_190982]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P400PG_190982] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study conducted comparative research on the preparation methods of human and animal bones as well as wooden remains from the Tunnug 1 site in the Tuva Republic. The results confirmed a highly consistent chronology of the sites, centered at 200-400 CE, but also highlighted issues with dating poorly preserved bones and wood.
Nine burials from Tunnug 1 site in Tuva Republic, which contained human and animal bones as well as remains of wood, were chosen for intercomparison study of preparation methods. Nine human bones, nine animal bones and 11 pieces of wood were prepared. Gelatin extracted from bones was purified using the UF method but the extraction from bones was modified with respect to acid and base treatment. Wood samples were treated as whole using acid-base-acid and cellulose was extracted for comparison. The results confirmed a highly consistent chronology of the sites centered at 200-400 CE, however, a few bones resulted in an offset between ages obtained by different methods. The extraction of cellulose was limited due to the poor preservation of wood. Our results highlight problems of dating poorly preserved bones and wood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available