4.3 Article

Plastics degradation by hydrolytic enzymes: The plastics-active enzymes database-PAZy

Journal

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 90, Issue 7, Pages 1443-1456

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.26325

Keywords

hidden Markov model; hydrolases; metagenome; polyethylene terephthalate degradation; polyurethane degradation; sequence motif

Funding

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [031B867B, 031B0837B, 031B0571B, 031B0571A, 031B0562A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article summarizes the current known enzymes that act on PET and PUR plastics, and integrates their activity data into a comprehensive database. Through analysis of homologs and conservation, common features of these active enzymes are identified.
Petroleum-based plastics are durable and accumulate in all ecological niches. Knowledge on enzymatic degradation is sparse. Today, less than 50 verified plastics-active enzymes are known. First examples of enzymes acting on the polymers polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyurethane (PUR) have been reported together with a detailed biochemical and structural description. Furthermore, very few polyamide (PA) oligomer active enzymes are known. In this article, the current known enzymes acting on the synthetic polymers PET and PUR are briefly summarized, their published activity data were collected and integrated into a comprehensive open access database. The Plastics-Active Enzymes Database (PAZy) represents an inventory of known and experimentally verified enzymes that act on synthetic fossil fuel-based polymers. Almost 3000 homologs of PET-active enzymes were identified by profile hidden Markov models. Over 2000 homologs of PUR-active enzymes were identified by BLAST. Based on multiple sequence alignments, conservation analysis identified the most conserved amino acids, and sequence motifs for PET- and PUR-active enzymes were derived.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available