Journal
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Volume 119, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2107346118
Keywords
choice architecture; nudge; behavioral insights; behavior change; meta-analysis
Categories
Funding
- Swiss National Science Foundation [PYAPP1_16057]
- Swiss Federal Office of Energy [SI/501597-01]
- Swiss Innovation Agency (Innosuisse)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Choice architecture interventions, based on insights from behavioral sciences, aim to facilitate desirable decision-making by designing choice environments without limiting freedom of choice. A comprehensive analysis of over 200 studies suggests that these interventions have an overall small to medium effect size in promoting behavior change, with food choices particularly responsive to such interventions.
Over the past decade, choice architecture interventions or socalled nudges have received widespread attention from both researchers and policy makers. Built on insights from the behavioral sciences, this class of behavioral interventions focuses on the design of choice environments that facilitate personally and socially desirable decisions without restricting people in their freedom of choice. Drawing on more than 200 studies reporting over 450 effect sizes (n = 2,149,683), we present a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions across techniques, behavioral domains, and contextual study characteristics. Our results show that choice architecture interventions overall promote behavior change with a small to medium effect size of Cohen's d = 0.45 (95% CI [0.39, 0.52]). In addition, we find that the effectiveness of choice architecture interventions varies significantly as a function of technique and domain. Across behavioral domains, interventions that target the organization and structure of choice alternatives (decision structure) consistently outperform interventions that focus on the description of alternatives (decision information) or the reinforcement of behavioral intentions (decision assistance). Food choices are particularly responsive to choice architecture interventions, with effect sizes up to 2.5 times larger than those in other behavioral domains. Overall, choice architecture interventions affect behavior relatively independently of contextual study characteristics such as the geographical location or the target population of the intervention. Our analysis further reveals a moderate publication bias toward positive results in the literature. We end with a discussion of the implications of our findings for theory and behaviorally informed policy making.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available