4.3 Article

The electrical magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) and shape factor impacts in a mixture fluid suspended by hybrid nanoparticles between non-parallel plates

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09544089211057971

Keywords

Hybrid nanofluid; joule heating; shape of nanoparticles; homotopy analysis method; Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg 4th-5th order; shooting technique

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research work focuses on the influences of nanoparticle shape and joule heating on the hydromagnetic flow of hybrid nanofluids between non-parallel plates. By considering a hybrid nanofluid with GO-MoS2 nanoparticles and utilizing numerical methods, the effects of various parameters on fluid velocity and skin friction are discussed. The theoretical results and efficacy of the homotopy analysis method are validated through numerical tests and presented graphically with detailed discussions.
In this research work, we introduce the influences of the shape of nanoparticles and joule heating in the hydromagnetic flow of hybrid nanofluids between non-parallel plates. A mixture base fluid (H2O (50%)-C2H6O2 (50%)), a hybrid nanofluid containing hybrid nanoparticles (graphene oxide-molybdenum disulfide, GO-MoS2) as nanoparticles, is considered. The non-linear governing equations are reduced into ordinary-differential equations (ODEs) by similarity transformations. The non-linear ordinary-differential equation (ODE) is solved numerically utilizing 4th-5th order Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg (RKF-45) with a shooting method and analytically using the homotopy analysis method (HAM). The effect of the rarefaction parameter, Reynolds number, channel angle, Hartmann number, electric field parameter, and the shape of nanoparticles on fluid velocity and skin friction are discussed and presented in a graphical form. Also, the theoretical results and the effectiveness of the homotopy analysis method (HAM) are confirmed by numerical tests and presented graphically coupled with detailed discussions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available