4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Metabolic response of fresh-cut apples induced by pulsed electric fields

Journal

INNOVATIVE FOOD SCIENCE & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages 356-364

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.06.016

Keywords

PEF; Apple tissue; Isothermal calorimetry; Respiration rate; HR-NMR; Metabolomics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pulsed electric field (PEF) treatments can induce metabolic stress responses in plant tissue as a function of the applied conditions. This study highlighted the metabolic effects of reversible and irreversible electroporation in fresh-cut apple tissue, by adjusting the electric field strength to 100, 250 and 400 V/cm (100 mu s pulse width, 60 pulses, 100 Hz). Metabolic heat, O-2 and CO2 gas analysis, along with metabolomics, were employed to jointly evaluate the PEF-induced effects after 24 hat 10 degrees C. Marked metabolic changes were registered when the threshold of irreversible electroporation was exceeded, at 250 and 400 V/cm. With such treatments, a drop of metabolic heat and respiration rate was observed, as a probable consequence of the loss of the cell viability, anaerobic respiration pathways were noticeably lowered, while gamma-aminobutyric acid metabolism was activated. Conversely, minimal modifications of the metabolism heat and metabolites concentrations were noticed when 100 V/cm was applied. Industrial relevance: Metabolic response of fresh-cut fruit and vegetables as function of the manufacturing process is a fundamental aspect directly related to the quality of the final products. Pulsed electric fields (PEF), as well as other innovative technologies, can induce undesired effects on tissue metabolism that might limit the industrial application. Furthermore, the analytical methods used in the present work provide useful tools for the optimization of the PEF treatment conditions for fresh-cut manufacturers. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available