4.7 Review

Hormesis and adult adipose-derived stem cells

Journal

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105803

Keywords

Hormesis; Biphasic dose response; Stem cells; Adipose-derived stem cells; Differentiation; Cell renewal

Funding

  1. United States Air Force, USA (AFOSR) [FA9550-19-1-0413]
  2. ExxonMobil Foundation, USA [S18200000000256]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides a detailed assessment of hormetic dose responses in adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) of animal models and humans, showing that hormetic dose responses are commonly reported for ADSCs and may have a determinant role in potential clinical applications.
This paper provides a detailed assessment of the occurrence of hormetic dose responses in adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) of animal models and humans. While a broad range of endpoints has been considered, the predominant research focus in the literature has involved cell proliferation and differentiation. Hormetic dose responses have been commonly reported for ADSCs, encompassing a broad range of chemicals, including pharmaceuticals, dietary supplements and endogenous agents as well as a broad range of physical stressors such as low frequency vibrations, electromagnetic frequency (EMF), heat and sound waves. Numerous agents upregulate key functions such as cell proliferation and differentiation in ADSCs, following the quantitative features of the hormesis dose response model. The paper also assesses the capacity of agents to selectively and dose-dependently activate cell proliferation and/or differentiation, their underlying mechanistic foundations and potential clinical implications. These findings indicate that hormetic dose responses are a prominent feature of ADSC biology and may have a determinant role in their potential clinical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available