4.5 Article

Occupation and COVID-19 mortality in England: a national linked data study of 14.3 million adults

Journal

OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 79, Issue 7, Pages 433-441

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107818

Keywords

COVID-19; occupational health

Funding

  1. National Core Study 'PROTECT' programme
  2. Colt Foundation [CF/05/20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Occupational differences in COVID-19 mortality were observed in a cohort study of 14 million people in England, with higher mortality rates found in occupations involving contact with patients or the public. Adjusting for confounding factors reduced the elevated risk for many occupations, and further adjustment for living conditions eliminated excess risk for many occupations, suggesting both workplace and non-workplace factors contribute to COVID-19 mortality.
Objectives To estimate occupational differences in COVID-19 mortality and test whether these are confounded by factors such as regional differences, ethnicity and education or due to non-workplace factors, such as deprivation or prepandemic health. Methods Using a cohort study of over 14 million people aged 40-64 years living in England, we analysed occupational differences in death involving COVID-19, assessed between 24 January 2020 and 28 December 2020. We estimated age-standardised mortality rates (ASMRs) per 100 000 person-years at risk stratified by sex and occupation. We estimated the effect of occupation on COVID-19 mortality using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for confounding factors. We further adjusted for non-workplace factors and interpreted the residual effects of occupation as being due to workplace exposures to SARS-CoV-2. Results In men, the ASMRs were highest among those working as taxi and cab drivers or chauffeurs at 119.7 deaths per 100 000 (95% CI 98.0 to 141.4), followed by other elementary occupations at 106.5 (84.5 to 132.4) and care workers and home carers at 99.2 (74.5 to 129.4). Adjusting for confounding factors strongly attenuated the HRs for many occupations, but many remained at elevated risk. Adjusting for living conditions reduced further the HRs, and many occupations were no longer at excess risk. For most occupations, confounding factors and mediators other than workplace exposure to SARS-CoV-2 explained 70%-80% of the excess age-adjusted occupational differences. Conclusions Working conditions play a role in COVID-19 mortality, particularly in occupations involving contact with patients or the public. However, there is also a substantial contribution from non-workplace factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available