Evaluating robotic pedicle screw placement against conventional modalities: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Evaluating robotic pedicle screw placement against conventional modalities: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Neurosurgical Focus
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages E10
Publisher
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Online
2022-01-01
DOI
10.3171/2021.10.focus21509
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Current state of navigation in spine surgery
- (2021) Nathaniel Rawicki et al. Annals of Translational Medicine
- Robotics in spine surgery: A systematic review
- (2021) Daniel M. McKenzie et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
- Robot-Assisted versus Freehand Instrumentation in Short-Segment Lumbar Fusion: Experience with Real-Time Image-Guided Spinal Robot
- (2020) Bowen Jiang et al. World Neurosurgery
- Surgeon proficiency in robot-assisted spine surgery
- (2020) Jake Michael McDonnell et al. Bone & Joint Journal
- Accuracy of robot-assisted versus conventional freehand pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- (2020) Yu-Ning Peng et al. Annals of Translational Medicine
- Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws compared to conventional free-hand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2020) Nida Fatima et al. Spine Journal
- Accuracy of Current Techniques for Placement of Pedicle Screws in the Spine: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 51,161 Screws
- (2019) Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja et al. World Neurosurgery
- Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Technique Versus Conventional Freehand Technique in Spine Surgery from Nine Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2019) Hui-Min Li et al. SPINE
- The European Robotic Spinal Instrumentation (EUROSPIN) study: protocol for a multicentre prospective observational study of pedicle screw revision surgery after robot-guided, navigated and freehand thoracolumbar spinal fusion
- (2019) Victor E Staartjes et al. BMJ Open
- Accuracy of pedicle screw placement comparing robot-assisted technology and the free-hand with fluoroscopy-guided method in spine surgery
- (2018) Yong Fan et al. MEDICINE
- Comparing Next-Generation Robotic Technology with 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Navigation Technology for the Insertion of Posterior Pedicle Screws
- (2018) Asham Khan et al. World Neurosurgery
- Navigation and Robotics in Spinal Surgery: Where Are We Now?
- (2017) Samuel C. Overley et al. NEUROSURGERY
- Accuracy of robot-guided versus freehand fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery
- (2017) Granit Molliqaj et al. Neurosurgical Focus
- Minimally Invasive Robotic Versus Open Fluoroscopic-guided Spinal Instrumented Fusions
- (2017) Seung-Jae Hyun et al. SPINE
- Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples
- (2017) Richard D Riley et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples
- (2017) Richard D Riley et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Letter to the Editor: Oswestry Disability Index
- (2013) Jeremy C. T. Fairbank JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Placement of Lumbar and Sacral Pedicle Screws
- (2012) Florian Ringel et al. SPINE
- Clinical Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Two-Dimensional Fluoroscopy for the Percutaneous Placement of Lumbosacral Pedicle Screws
- (2010) Bheeshma Ravi et al. SPINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started