4.8 Article

pH-Mediated Clustering of Exosomes: Breaking Through the Size Limit of Exosome Analysis in Conventional Flow Cytometry

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages 8817-8823

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03211

Keywords

exosome; molecular detection; cancer diagnosis; pH-responsive polymer

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFA0210100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21775075, 21977053]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Nankai University [2122018165]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exosomes have emerged as promising biomarkers for disease diagnosis. A pH-mediated assembly system was developed to convert nanosized exosomes into microsized clusters, allowing for analysis beyond the size limit of exosomes. The combination of MUC-1 and PD-L1 was identified as a new biomarker panel for early diagnosis of liver cancer.
Exosomes have recently emerged as some of the most promising biomarkers for disease diagnosis. Due to their small sizes and composition heterogeneity, exosomes are difficult to detect by currently available platforms. Here, we report a pH-mediated assembly system that converts single nanosized exosomes into microsized clusters, which can be directly analyzed by conventional flow cytometry (FCM), breaking through the size limit of exosome analysis. We demonstrated the clinical utility of the pH-mediated clustering system by profiling the exosomal proteins from blood plasma samples of 33 cancer patients and 11 benign controls. The results indicated that the combination of MUC-1 and PD-L1 could serve as a new biomarker panel for the early diagnosis of liver cancer with high clinical accuracy. This pHmediated assembly strategy allows rapid, sensitive, and high-throughput analysis of exosome biomarkers by conventional FCM, which can be easily refined for use in both basic and clinical settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available