4.5 Article

Improving mortality data in Jordan: a 10 year review

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
Volume 93, Issue 10, Pages 727-731

Publisher

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.14.137190

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health of Jordan
  2. WHO
  3. CDC
  4. USAID

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Problem Before 2003 there was substantial underreporting of deaths in Jordan. The death notification form did not comply with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and information on the cause of death was often missing, incomplete or inaccurate. Approach A new mortality surveillance system to determine the causes of death was implemented in 2003 and a unit for coding causes of death was established at the ministry of health. Local setting Jordan is a middle-income country with a population of 6.4 million people. Approximately 20 000 deaths were registered per year between 2005 and 2011. Relevant changes In 2001, the ministry of health organized the first meeting on Jordan's mortality system, which yielded a five-point plan to improve mortality statistics. Using the recommendations produced from this meeting, in 2003 the ministry of health initiated a mortality statistics improvement project in collaboration with international partners. Jordan has continued to improve its mortality reporting system, with annual reporting since 2004. Reports are based on more than 70% of reported deaths. The quality of cause-of-death information has improved, with only about 6% of deaths allocated to symptoms and ill-defined conditions a substantial decrease from the percentage before 2001 (40%). Mortality information is now submitted to WHO following international standards. Lessons learnt After 10 years of mortality surveillance in Jordan, the reporting has improved and the information has been used by various health programmes throughout Jordan.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available