4.7 Article

Handheld near-infrared spectrometer allows on-line prediction of beef quality traits

Journal

MEAT SCIENCE
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108694

Keywords

Meat; Fatty acids; Minerals; Technological traits; Portable NIR instrument

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to evaluate the ability of a miniaturized near-infrared spectrometer to predict various chemical parameters and quality traits in beef, showing satisfactory results for predicting moisture, fat and protein contents, fatty acids, minerals, and other quality traits. The handheld instrument demonstrated potential for on-line prediction of beef quality traits without the need for sampling or meat products' loss due to carcass deterioration.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of a miniaturized near-infrared spectrometer to predict chemical parameters, technological and quality traits, fatty acids and minerals in intact Longissimus thoracis and Trapezius obtained from the ribs of 40 Charolais cattle. Modified partial least squares regression analysis to correlate spectra information to reference values, and several scatter correction and mathematical treatments have been tested. Leave-one-out cross-validation results showed that the handheld instrument could be used to obtain a good prediction of moisture and an approximate quantitative prediction of fat or protein contents, a*, b*, shear force and purge loss with coefficients of determination above 0.66. Moreover, prediction models were satis-factory for proportions of MUFA, PUFA, oleic and palmitic acids, for Fe and Cu contents. Overall, results exhibited the usefulness of the on-line miniaturized tool to predict some beef quality traits and the possibility to use it with commercial cuts without sampling, carcass deterioration nor grinding and consequent meat products' loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available