4.7 Article

Intestinal explant barrier chip: long-term intestinal absorption screening in a novel microphysiological system using tissue explants

Journal

LAB ON A CHIP
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 326-342

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1lc00669j

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The IEBC is a novel screening platform that benefits from the complexity of tissue explants and the flow in microfluidic chips, improving the prediction of drug absorption in the intestine by extending tissue viability in a dynamic microfluidic environment. Studying tissue function, integrity, and viability allows for accurate prediction of drug absorption in the intestine.
The majority of intestinal in vitro screening models use cell lines that do not reflect the complexity of the human intestinal tract and hence often fail to accurately predict intestinal drug absorption. Tissue explants have intact intestinal architecture and cell type diversity, but show short viability in static conditions. Here, we present a medium throughput microphysiological system, Intestinal Explant Barrier Chip (IEBC), that creates a dynamic microfluidic microenvironment and prolongs tissue viability. Using a snap fit mechanism, we successfully incorporated human and porcine colon tissue explants and studied tissue functionality, integrity and viability for 24 hours. With a proper distinction of transcellular over paracellular transport (ratio >2), tissue functionality was good at early and late timepoints. Low leakage of FITC-dextran and preserved intracellular lactate dehydrogenase levels indicate maintained tissue integrity and viability, respectively. From a selection of low to high permeability drugs, 6 out of 7 properly ranked according to their fraction absorbed. In conclusion, the IEBC is a novel screening platform benefitting from the complexity of tissue explants and the flow in microfluidic chips.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available