4.7 Article

The maintained attention assessment in patients affected by Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a reliable biomarker?

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-03153-1

Keywords

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis; Chronic Fatigue Syndrome; Maintained attention; Toulouse-Pieron test

Funding

  1. University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU) [GIU 092/19, PI 20/01076]
  2. Foundation Jesus Gangoiti Barrera (Bilbao-Spain)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that patients with CFS/ME have low maintained attention and significant cognitive fatigue, with deficits in sustained attention and perception of fatigue serving as sensitive and reliable indicators for confirming or ruling out CFS/ME.
The maintained attention is the cause of great functional limitations in CFS/ME, a disease that mainly affects women in the central period of life. Cognitive function is explored using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the maintained attention using the Toulouse-Pieron test with which the Global Index of Attention and Perception (GIAP) is obtained, the fatigue using the visual analog scale and the perception of effort using the modified Borg scale. The final sample were 84 patients (66 women/18 men) who met diagnostic criteria (Fukuda-1994, Carruthers-2011) and 22 healthy controls (14 women/8 men). Most of patients maintain normal cognitive function, showing low or very low attention score in the 70% of patients with a marked cognitive fatigue compared to the control group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between genders in GIAP or fatigue for CFS/ME; however, sick women perceive cognitive effort higher than men. Deficits in sustained attention and the perception of fatigue, so effort after performing the proposed test are a sensitive and reliable indicator that allows us to substantiate a clinical suspicion and refer patients for further studies in order to confirm or rule out CFS/ME.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available