4.1 Article

Effect of reactive gases (NH3/N2) on silicon-nitride thin films deposited with diiodosilane (SiH2I2) precursors

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages 311-319

Publisher

KOREAN PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1007/s40042-021-00354-1

Keywords

PE-ALD; Si3N4; Plasma treatment; Impurity concentration; Diiodosilane; LP-CVD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully produced silicon nitride thin films with superior properties using the PE-ALD method and iodine-based precursors, addressing issues related to high temperatures and impurity concentration in traditional methods.
A more in-depth study was conducted on silicon nitride thin films deposited using the space-divided plasma enhance atomic layer deposition (PE-ALD) method. Existing silicon nitride thin films are fabricated using thermal chemical vapor deposition (CVD) at high temperatures of 700 degrees C or higher with carbon (C)- and chlorine (Cl)-based precursors. However, the high process temperature and the high concentration of C and Cl in films cause a slew of issues for semiconductor integration. In this study, the silicon-nitride thin films have been deposited using the PE-ALD method and an iodine-based precursor to solve these problems. NH3 and N-2 gases were used as the reactant gases. When N-2 was used as the reactant gas instead of NH3, the concentration of the hydrogen (H) impurity was reduced from 19 to 15%. A plasma treatment was used to improve the density and remove the impurities in the thin films; the density of the thin films was confirmed to be 3.21 g/cm(3), and the H concentration was 11%, indicating that the properties had improved. When a small amount of He gas was added to N-2, the step coverage properties were improved up to 99.2%. The results of this study confirmed that silicon nitride thin films having superior properties can be produced using iodine-based precursors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available