4.3 Article

Examining the Contribution of a Professional Development Program to Elementary Classroom Teachers' Content Knowledge and Student Achievement: The Case of Basketball

Journal

JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 577-588

Publisher

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/jtpe.2020-0010

Keywords

content training; in-service teachers; intervention studies; teacher knowledge

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the contribution of a content-focused PD program to teachers' CK and SA in basketball, demonstrating that teachers who participated in the PD program exhibited higher learning gains in their CK, leading to higher learning gains in their students. The findings suggest that PD programs focused on enhancing teachers' CK might also support student achievement.
Purpose: Teacher content knowledge (CK) and its contribution to student achievement (SA) are understudied in physical education, especially concerning the examination of the effectiveness of professional development (PD) programs using direct measures of teachers' CK and SA. To make progress in this research area, this study investigated the contribution of a content-focused PD program to teachers' CK and SA in basketball, using direct measures thereof. Methods: A quasi-experimental design was utilized to examine the contribution of a PD program. The authors measured the CK of 52 elementary classroom teachers and their fifth or sixth grade students' (n = 913) achievement in basketball before and after the PD program. The data were analyzed using unilevel and multilevel regression analyses. Results: Teachers who participated in the PD program exhibited higher learning gains in their CK; their students also exhibited higher learning gains. Discussion and Conclusion: The study findings suggest that PD programs focused on enhancing teachers' CK might also support SA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available