4.3 Article

Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2015

Journal

JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages 230-246

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab129

Keywords

structure survey; radiotherapy institution; radiotherapy personnel; radiotherapy equipment

Funding

  1. JASTRO
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JSPS KAKENHI] [JP21K07728]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article describes the structure of radiation oncology in Japan, including equipment, personnel, patient load, and geographic distribution, to overcome existing limitations. The study shows that there has been significant improvement in equipment and utilization in the field, although there was a shortage of personnel in 2015.
This article describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From May 2016 to August 2018, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnaire based on the Japanese national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2015. Data were analyzed based on the institutional stratification by the annual number of new patients treated with radiotherapy per institution. The estimated annual numbers of new and total (new plus repeat) patients treated with radiation were 225 000 and 271 000, respectively. Additionally, the estimated cancer incidence was 891 445 cases with approximately 25.2% of all newly diagnosed patients being treated with radiation. The types and numbers of treatment devices actually used included linear accelerator (linac; n = 936), Gamma Knife (n = 43), Co-60 remote afterloading system (RALS; n = 21), and Ir-192 RALS (n = 129). The linac system used dual-energy functions in 754 units, 3D conformal radiotherapy functions in 867, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) functions in 628. There were 899 Japan Radiological Society/Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology-certified radiation oncologists (RO), 1213.9 full-time equivalent (FTE) ROs, 2394.2 FTE radiotherapy technologists (RTT), 295.7 FTE medical physicists, 210.2 FTE radiotherapy quality managers, and 906.1 FTE nurses. The frequency of IMRT use significantly increased during this time. In conclusion, the Japanese structure of radiation oncology has clearly improved in terms of equipment and utility although there was a shortage of personnel in 2015.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available