4.7 Article

Predicting New Daily COVID-19 Cases and Deaths Using Search Engine Query Data in South Korea From 2020 to 2021: Infodemiology Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/34178

Keywords

prediction; internet search; COVID-19; South Korea; infodemiology

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [MOST109-2221-E-038-018, MOST110-2628-E-038-001]
  2. Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education in Taiwan [DP2-110-21121-01-A-13]
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education [2021R1A6A1A10044154]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the impact of incorporating search engine query data into models for predicting short- and long-term new daily COVID-19 cases and deaths. The results showed that generalized linear models with different distribution functions may be beneficial in the early stages of the outbreak, while linear regression models with regularization may outperform over longer periods. Additionally, NAVER search volumes were found to be important variables for prediction with higher feature effects in the first 6 months of the outbreak.
Background: Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic situation, accurate predictions could greatly help in the health resource management for future waves. However, as a new entity, COVID-19's disease dynamics seemed difficult to predict. External factors, such as internet search data, need to be included in the models to increase their accuracy. However, it remains unclear whether incorporating online search volumes into models leads to better predictive performances for long-term prediction. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze whether search engine query data are important variables that should be included in the models predicting new daily COVID-19 cases and deaths in short- and long-term periods. Methods: We used country-level case-related data, NAVER search volumes, and mobility data obtained from Google and Apple for the period of January 20, 2020, to July 31, 2021, in South Korea. Data were aggregated into four subsets: 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after the first case was reported. The first 80% of the data in all subsets were used as the training set, and the remaining data served as the test set. Generalized linear models (GLMs) with normal, Poisson, and negative binomial distribution were developed, along with linear regression (LR) models with lasso, adaptive lasso, and elastic net regularization. Root mean square error values were defined as a loss function and were used to assess the performance of the models. All analyses and visualizations Results: GLMs with different types of distribution functions may have been beneficial in predicting new daily COVID-19 cases and deaths in the early stages of the outbreak. Over longer periods, as the distribution of cases and deaths became more normally distributed, LR models with regularization may have outperformed the GLMs. This study also found that models performed better when predicting new daily deaths compared to new daily cases. In addition, an evaluation of feature effects in the models showed that NAVER search volumes were useful variables in predicting new daily COVID-19 cases, particularly in the first 6 months of the outbreak. Searches related to logistical needs, particularly for thermometer and mask strap, showed higher feature effects in that period. For longer prediction periods, NAVER search volumes were still found to constitute an important variable, although with a lower feature effect. This finding suggests that search term use should be considered to maintain the predictive Conclusions: NAVER search volumes were important variables in short- and long-term prediction, with higher feature effects for predicting new daily COVID-19 cases in the first 6 months of the outbreak. Similar results were also found for death predictions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available